Saturday, September 30, 2006

Pangyayari

wag abusuhin ang pagiging mapaglaro ko
pagkat napapatid din ang pisi ko
unawain nyo sana ang talas ng aking dila
pagkat katangian kong ito, di na mawawala
salamat sa mga nakinig, salamat sa puso
pagkat ang pananahimik ko'y binasag sa inyo
wag na sanang maulit ang mga pangyayari
pagkat di ako papayag na tao'y mawili
pipiliin ko ngayon ang maging mapagbigay
pagkat pasensya ko lagi ang aking alay


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.

Paglayo

sa oras na ikaw ay lumayo
isipin mong mabuti kung bakit
wag padalos-dalos sa kilos
pigilan mabuti ang sarili

sa oras na ikaw ay lumayo
wag magtanga-tangahan
makiramdam at wag manhid
lalo na't may pinagsamahan

sa oras na ikaw ay lumayo
umasang may babalikan
tunay na kasama
handang tanggapin ka

sa oras na ikaw ay lumayo
pakasiguro na tama ka
namnamin ang tagumpay
baka desisyo'y sumablay

sa oras na ikaw ay lumayo
baka umikot ang mundo
ang ginawa mong paglisan
sya mo ring maranasan


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Gising Na

bakit uso ang 'attitude problem' at ang issue na kasama nito? andami kasing side comments ng iba sa kung ano ang hindi kayang gawin ng iba pa o di kaya'y dun sa mga pangit nilang nagagawa. and i even hear both sides lagi. mahirap i-absorb ang bawat panig. mahirap ding magsalita laban sa iba. kadalasan, takot namang humarap sa taong tinutukoy. hindi man takot eh laging sa ibang tao nagkukwento about sa iba pang tao. syempre, yung mga yun ay may basis naman, hindi naman kasi mapag-uusapan kung walang pinagmulan. kung hindi naman yun totoo, eh di wala, wala dapat magalit or mag-react. pero sa napapansin ko eh hindi 'daw' ang mga naririnig ko kundi mga actual na sinabi sa kanila ng mga taong nakausap nila. kaya para sa mga hindi pa mulat sa attitude problem nila, dilat na, gising na. ^_^


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Idea

why didn't anyone buy my idea?

i am referring to one of our class presentations. my exact idea was the actual words of our professor, even colorful. nakakahinayang.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Pluto

it's so sad that we only have eight planets now.

pluto is no longer part of the solar system, that is, it is no longer considered one of the major planets. it has been re-categorized as one of the "dwarf-planets", others being the ceres and the 2003 UB313.

(august 24) the international astronomical union (IAU) members gathered at the 2006 general assembly agreed that a "planet" is defined as a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.* given this definition, they voted that pluto does not fit to be a planet but a dwarf-planet.

a dwarf planet is defined as a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape , (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.*

in my personal point of view, i do not want pluto to be expelled from the solar system. i grew up knowing, accepting, and liking that we have nine planets in our solar system. changing this would somehow dishearten me since i like pluto very much. i like it in a way that it is (or was) the smallest planet, the mystery it gives of what more could be inside it as the supposed-to-be farthest known planet, the creep it brings when it is described as a frozen planet (since it is very far from the sun), etc.

however, i am not against changes. if those who know better than me (the astronomers) decided that pluto must take a different category, so be it. the change is just a bit hard to take since pluto has already established its place and name in the solar system, and has been accepted as a unique planet (not a dwarf-planet) since its discovery.

*http://www-csm.stecf.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0603/index.html


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.